Profile
Analytical article General characteristics of the genre. Analytical article is one of the most difficult journalistic genres. Typically, such texts are written by experienced journalists specializing in a particular topic, or experts who know how to express their thoughts in understandable language. Analytical articles are published, first of all, in magazines - print and online, as these materials are designed for long thoughtful reading. An analytical article is devoted to explaining what is happening in a certain area, identifying hidden causes and making forecasts for the further development of events. An analytical article can build on well-known facts and problems, but give them a new interpretation. So when the magazine of Newsweek (issued from 2004 to 2010) was transformed from a journalistic publication in the analytical magazine has become the motto "Everyone knows we know." A new understanding of what is happening is what analytical articles are read for. Therefore, the answer to the question " how to write a reflection ?" the originality of the hypothesis, the depth of penetration into the topic and the validity of the arguments and conclusions are determined . Objectivity is also important for an analytical article. If an author selects arguments in support of his hypothesis and ignores what contradicts this hypothesis, such analytics will only mislead the reader. The reader, who is familiar with the topic and knows what the journalist has hidden, will perceive the material with distrust. A good journalist-analyst uses a fact or an argument that contradicts the hypothesis as an opportunity to clarify it, to show its limitations, while confirming its correctness. Only in this case, the analytical article will enjoy the trust of the audience. Collecting information for an analytical article. The preparation of an analytical article begins with the construction of a hypothesis. For example, the journalist decided to prove that the anti-icing agents used in his city at the moment (if the material is being prepared in winter) are dangerous to people and the environment, and more dangerous than other existing reagents and other anti-icing measures. This will be a working hypothesis. Then the journalist plunges into the topic. In the case of anti-icing reagents, this will be the study of everything related to them: the composition of reagents and the potential harm of these substances and their combinations, examples of such harm, studies of the effect of reagents on humans, animals and plants. You also need to find reagent specialists and talk to them. At the first stage, communication is carried out not so much in order to then quote this specialist in the material, but for one's own understanding of the problematic and for the opportunity to clarify the hypothesis. For a student, this can seem like a bit of a challenge, especially if this is the first time. A journalist-to-be is a difficult profession, so you should understand that if you cannot cope with this process, contact essay help . There can be several cycles of hypothesis refinement. For example, at first the journalist assumes that the reagents used in his city are extremely harmful in principle. Then it turns out that the reagents are harmful only in certain doses. Then - that not all reagents are harmful, but only some. Then - that to minimize harm, reagents must be used in appropriate combinations, and the danger arises when this rule is violated. Further, the direction of research may become different - the journalist will find out to what extent the reagents are correctly combined by those who use them. When the answer to this question is found, new questions will arise: why is this happening, who is to blame for this, and who benefits from it. The research can be continued indefinitely. This, in fact, is how science works, when the answer to a question leads to new questions. But it is advisable for a journalist to stop at some point, having decided on a hypothesis that is confirmed and that would be of interest to a wide audience. The two loop method can be used here: - the first cycle - a working hypothesis and preliminary acquaintance with the topic to test and refine the hypothesis; - the second cycle - the final hypothesis, which will be offered to the reader as an idea for an analytical article. Further collection of information is already aimed at finding evidence for a hypothesis and at identifying and eliminating contradictions. For example, a journalist decided to dwell on the fact that deicing agents are harmful, but this harm can be minimized by constantly adjusting the combination of reagents to the state of the environment. Then the sources of information can be: - regulatory documents concerning the use of deicing agents (laws, regulations , etc.); - organizations that carry out the treatment of roads with anti-icing reagents; - personal observation of the journalist over the treatment of roads with reagents, communication with the workers who perform this treatment; - officials in charge of road conditions; - ecologists who have studied the impact of reagents on the environment; - physicians and veterinarians who are able to assess the effect of reagents on human and animal health; - car service technicians who are able to assess the impact of reagents on cars; - scientists-chemists who understand the mechanism of action of reagents and the possibilities of science in this area; - scientific research concerning the use of reagents. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: https://www.bolognafc.it/members/esmejohnson/info/ https://beerconnoisseur.com/blogs/international-students-day-how-have-students-influenced-brewing https://mentalitch.com/7-tips-from-a-harvard-lecturer-on-how-to-become-a-happier-student/
Forum Role: Participant
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0